1-866-735-2792
Talk to a personal injury lawyer.
Featured Topics Related Practices
Recall Announcements
- Zimmer Knee Implants: Certain Zimmer NexGen knee implant models are failing at a high rate...
- Ladder Recalls: Louisville Ladder recalled about 25,000 extension ladders carrying the “Michigan” and “Louisville/Davidson” brands...
- AED Heart Device Deaths: The FDA has notified consumers, hospitals, and medical professionals that Cardiac Science Corporation must recall Automated External Defibrillators...
- Defective Stroller Recall: Maclaren USA is recalling approximately one million strollers...
- Fosamax Lawsuits: Fosamax linked to serious side effect risks including osteonecrosis of the jaw, heart arrhythmia, thigh bone fractures, painful eye inflammations, and esophagus cancer.
Class Action
Folbaum v. Dexall Sundown. $500,000 Dollar Verdict for Class Action in Calcium Supplement Case. David Jacoby convinced a jury that a pharmaceutical company mislabeled the benefits of a calcium supplement in a class of all New Jersey citizens. A $500,000 dollar verdict was handed down in Camden County Court.
AM/PM Franchisee Association v. Atlantic Richfield Company. Sol Weiss earned a confidential multi-million dollar class action settlement for AM/PM Mini Market Operators against Atlantic Richfield Company to recover lost profits when ARCO supplied defective gasoline to dealers in New York and Pennsylvania.
Ewing v. Rohm and Haas. Toxic Tort Class Action Leads to Company Compensating All Homeowners. Larry Cohan represented our clients in this toxic tort class action claim against Rohn and Haas, which arose out of extensive property damage caused by chemicals leaking from under its Bridesburg, Philadelphia chemical manufacturing facility. The company agreed to compensate all of the homeowners affected by the leak, and, in many cases, to purchase their homes.
Augenstein v. Coldwell Banker, Case No. 2:10-cv-191, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. Anapol Schwartz represents the plaintiffs and the class of buyers and sellers for whom the case is filed were charged a $199 junk fee and want a refund from Caldwell Banker. The case is based on a federal consumer protection statute known as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).
