1-866-735-2792
Talk to a personal injury lawyer.
Work Injuries
Practice Area Attorneys
- Sol Weiss, Shareholder
(Pharmaceutical Liability, Dangerous Drugs, Class Actions, Stockbroker Liability, Securities Litigation, Products Liability, Workers Comp) - Lawrence R. Cohan, Shareholder
(Environmental & Toxic Torts Law, Vaccines, Biomedical Tissue Services, Pharmaceutical Liability, Dangerous Drugs) - Joel Feldman, Shareholder
(Securities Litigation, Automobile Accidents, Slips and Falls, Class Actions, Products Liability) - Thomas Anapol, Shareholder
(Environmental and Toxix Torts Law, Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death, Pharmaceutical Liability, Dangerous Drugs) - Mark J. LeWinter, Shareholder
(Product Liability, Flammable Products, Construction Accidents) - James R. Ronca, Shareholder
(Truck Accidents, Medical Malpractice, Unsafe Drugs, Construction Site Accidents, Products Liability, Auto Accidents) - Miriam Benton Barish, Non-Equity Partner
- Tracy A. Finken, Non-Equity Partner
- Barry Hill, Non-Equity Partner
- Gregory Spizer, Non-Equity Partner
- Michael L. Barbiero, Associate
- Jeffrey S. Downs, Associate
- Melissa Fry Hague, Associate
- Amber Racine, Associate
- Michael C. Schafle, Associate
- Adrianne Walvoord, Associate
Machine Guarding
One of the most common types of workplace injuries occurs when machine operators suffer amputations, lacerations, de-gloving or other serious injuries from the operation of machinery that is not properly guarded.
Moving machine parts can cause severe injuries. Safeguards are essential to protect workers from preventable injuries. Whenever the operation of a machine can injure the operator or others, the hazards must be either eliminated or designed out of the product.
If this is not possible and the hazard cannot be eliminated, it must be guarded against and a warning must be provided to avoid the hazard. This is often referred to as the "Engineering Hierarchy.” Design out, guard against and warn.
Many guarding principles have been in use in the industry for over 100 years. For example, the first patent for an interlocking guard was awarded in 1899 for a power press. Sadly, while guarding technology has been readily available for decades, many manufacturers fail to avail itself of basic safety engineering that could save lives and prevent needless suffering and tragedy.
There are many types of guards that are appropriate for different products depending on the use for which the product is intended. Some examples of guards include: fixed barrier guards; moveable interlocking guards; and light curtains and sensors that detect the entry of fingers or the operator’s hands.
Cases involving serious injury due to improper guarding often involve situations where a product had a poorly designed guard that was removed exposing the operator to serious injury. If the manufacturer could have, and should have reasonably expected that the guard would be removed, the removal of the guard does not shield the manufacturer from liability.
If you or someone you know has been injured, we can assist you in evaluating your case. Click here to contact us for a free case evaluation.
Machine Guarding News
- $2.72 Million Dollar Verdict for Machine Operator pt. 1
- $2.72 Million Dollar Verdict for Machine Operator pt. 2
- Summaries with Trial Analysis
