Construction Accident Lawsuit & News Blog
Construction Accident Lawsuits and Class Actions | Construction Accident Blog Home | Construction Accident Archives | Construction Accident Articles | Construction Accident Category Index | Do You Operate A Forklift? How Safe Are You? | Crane Accident: What factors might reduce the risk: Do You Need A Crane lawyer? | Defective Machinery Cause of many Construction Accidents: Do You Need A Crane lawyer? | Ladder Safety Resources |
Do I have a Construction Accident Lawsuit?
Construction Accident Lawsuits and Class Actions : Construction Accident Blog Home : OSHA : Article

OSHA Wrongly Withheld Toxic Exposure Data and Jeopardized OSHA Inspectors Health

Each year, an estimated 40,000 U.S. workers die prematurely because of exposures to toxic substances on the job.

The U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) has wrongfully withheld data documenting years of toxic exposures to workers and its own inspectors, according to a federal court ruling posted on July 3, 2007 by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

The federal court ruling came in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Dr. Adam M. Finkel, a former chief regulator at OSHA and now a professor of environmental and occupational health at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, School of Public Health, and a visiting professor at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University. His career at OSHA came to an end after disclosing OSHA's secret decision in 2002 not to offer medical testing to its own inspectors who had been exposed to beryllium dust. Beryllium dust can cause a unique and often-fatal lung disease, known as "chronic beryllium disease" or CBD.

In 2005, Dr. Finkel filed a request under FOIA for release of the entire contents of the OSHA database on toxic exposures, which contains the concentration of each substance found (e.g., asbestos, lead, benzene, silica dust), the company where the sample was taken, and an encrypted code for the inspector who took the sample. He also requested coded information about the results of beryllium sensitization tests conducted on OSHA inspectors. OSHA denied both requests, claiming that among the sampling results there may have been trade secrets and that releasing the encrypted codes could somehow compromise inspectors' privacy.

Judge Mary L. Cooper of the Federal District Court in Trenton, New Jersey said that withholding the data lacked any merit. She found that public interest in disclosing information will increase understanding about beryllium sensitization and OSHA's response significant.

Dr. Finkel questioned if OSHA forgot that it exists to protect workers, not to protect its own executives. The validity of Dr. Finkel's disclosures has been confirmed in tests showing an unexpectedly high incidence of blood abnormalities among a small group of OSHA inspectors, who finally were offered the medical tests in 2004, after settling his whistleblower retaliation case against OSHA and returned to academia. This finding has serious implications for the majority of current and former OSHA inspectors who still have not been offered testing, as well as for an estimated 130,000 private-sector workers who are exposed to beryllium daily. OSHA's permissible beryllium exposure limit was developed almost 60 years ago and has not been updated. Experts agree that the equivalent of one day's exposure at the current limit can cause CBD.

OSHA's perverse posture in this case fits its pattern of studiously ignoring occupational health hazards ranging from popcorn lung disease to the epidemic of pulmonary maladies among Ground Zero workers. Congress should identify the officials responsible for this fiasco before the Bush administration awards them bonuses.

Have you suffered work related toxic exposure? Has your employer been sympathetic to your plight? Do you need a Pennsylvania law firm to represent you as an individual or in a class action in regard to work related toxic exposure lawsuit? Contact Anapol Schwartz to find out what your legal options are.

http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_60420.shtml

 © 2007 Anapol Schwartz | AddThis Social Bookmark Button